Legal Opinion

Ceska Farmarska Vzajemne Pojistujici Spolecnost v. Pavek

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1938No. 31,804PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

After the decision in Pavek v. Ceska Farmarska Vzajemne Pojistujici Spolecnost, 202 Minn. 304, 278 N. W. 367, the district court of LeSueur county changed the place of trial to Rice county, and relator applied for a writ of mandamus to remand the case for trial to LeSueur county.

The action is transitory and defendant is a domestic corporation, hence the district court of any county has jurisdiction. The articles of incorporation designate the principal office of defendant as in New Prague, LeSueur county, but defendant is authorized to transact business in certain townships in the counties of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pavek v. Ceska Farmarska Vzajemne Pojistujici SpolecnostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Clifford v. GislasonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Thomas v. Hector Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API