Legal Opinion
Krondes v. O'Boy
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 21, 2002No. AC 19292PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendants William O’Boy, Sr., and his wife, Carmela B. O’Boy, appeal, and the plaintiff Florence Krondes1 cross appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, awarding damages to the plaintiff. On appeal, the defendants2 argue that the court improperly refused to set aside the verdict because the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S. C. § 362 voided any trial court action between the filing *804for bankruptcy and the bankruptcy discharge.3 The dis-positive issue on appeal is whether the stay operated to void actions taken by, and the judgment of,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Albany Partners, Ltd. v. Westbrook (In Re Albany Partners, Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Rexnord Holdings, Inc. v. Maurice BidermannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Soares v. Brockton Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Thomas v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Groner v. Miller (In Re Miller)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Provident Bank v. LewittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Macy v. LucasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Ramsay v. Camrac, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Joyner v. Simkins Industries, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- U.S. Bank, National Assn. v. MamudiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.