Legal Opinion
K.E. v. Hoffman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 13, 1990No. C3-89-697PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Judge.
This is a remand from the supreme court ordering this court to consider the applicability and constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 541.073 (Supp.1989). Respondents contend section 541.073 is not rationally related to a legitimate government purpose and violates their right of due process of law. They also argue that section 541.073 is special legislation in violation of the Minnesota Constitution. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant K.E. alleges his fifth grade teacher, respondent Robert Hoffman, sexually assaulted him on two occasions during the fall of 1975. The facts…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. SundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re TvetenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Jefferson CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- M.L. v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Almonte v. New York Medical CollegeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Cosgriffe v. CosgriffeMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Gibson v. GibsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.