Legal Opinion
A. W. Hartman Shoe Co. v. Hanson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 1925No. 18847. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— This is an action on an account. The account is a long and complicated one, extending from 1918 to near the end of 1922. The sum demanded by respondent was $449.06, together with interest at the legal rate from November 12, 1921, until paid. The court allowed the sum of $422.16, with interest from the date of the last item, and stated, “this is approximately the amount Mrs. Hanson admitted her hooks showed to be due plaintiff at the time the last payment was made.”
Attached to the complaint and marked “Exhibit A” was a statement of the goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cascade Lumber Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Lloyd v. American Can Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
- McDonald v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Sanborn v. DentlerWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Royal Dairy Products Co. v. Spokane Dairy Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Neff v. Western Cooperative HatcheriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Ryan v. PlathWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Atkin v. Long Lake Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. Smith & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.