Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Casualty Ins. v. Smith & Smith, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1932No. 6649PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR., Circuit Judge.

This action was brought to recover upon a bond given by the appellant Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company in connection with the performance of certain road work for the Department of Agriculture. Plaintiff having recovered the full penalty of the bond, the surety company appeals from the decision.

It seems that Albert L. Smith had entered into a contract with the Bureau, of Public Roads, Department of Agriculture of the United States, for the construction of a road. A portion of this work Smith sub*700let to Logan Bros., and another portion he sublet to Poe Bros. Smith…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Orinoco Supply Co. v. Shaw Bros. LumberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Cascade Lumber Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Equitable Trust Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Haas v. DudleyOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Pankey v. National Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J. Wilton Graves v. Harry L. Garvin, as AgentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API