Legal Opinion
Smith v. Kroesen
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 25, 2014No. Civ. A. No. 10-5723 (NLH)(AMD)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the motion of defendant, Mark Cooley, for summary judgment in his favor on the claims of plaintiff, Paul Smith, that defendant is liable for injuries plaintiff sustained while pláying in a rugby match. For the reasons expressed below, defendant’s motion will be granted.
BACKGROUND
On April 10, 2010, plaintiff Paul Smith, a member of the Jersey Shore Sharks rugby team, was playing in a rugby match against Old Gaelic Rugby Football Club, which was coached by defendant Mark Cooley. ' A rugby match is comprised of two, 40-minute halves,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- BOUTAHLI v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- BROWN v. CITY OF JERSEY CITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- BROWN v. CITY OF JERSEY CITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- EDWARDS v. LINDENWOLD POLICE DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- K.G. v. OWL CITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.