Yahola Sand & Gravel Company v. Marx
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.
Many years ago Mr. Frank Marx, the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to merely as plaintiff, was in the employ of a railway corporation. He knew how to figure rates and taxes on interstate shipments.
Mr. Walter Dills was then the manager of a concern which was the predecessor of plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to merely as defendant. Mr. Dills induced Mr. Marx to leave the railway and come with his concern, promising that when he came to retire he would be paid the same as railroad retirement would provide.
It has developed that if he had remained…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Simmons & Simmons Construction Co. v. W. L. Rea D.B.A. W. L. Rea Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1955
- Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. SwiftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
- McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Yarnall v. Yorkshire Worsted MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Cuneo v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970
- Kover v. HufsmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
- Gran v. City of St. Paul, Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Hays v. Monticello Retirement Estates, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.