Legal Opinion
Tattoo Art, Inc. v. TAT International, LLC
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided May 14, 2010No. Civil Action 2:09cv314PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants TAT International, LLC (“TAT”) and Kirk Knapp’s (“Knapp”) (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss and Request for Costs and Attorney’s Fees. (Docket Nos. 15 & 16.) The issues have been fully briefed, the parties have presented oral arguments, and the matter is now ripe for decision. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and DENIES Defendants’ Request for Costs and Attorney’s Fees.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Tattoo Art, Inc. (“Tattoo Art” or “Plaintiff’) is a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Colgan Air, Inc. v. Raytheon Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- American Bankers Insurance Group, Incorporated v. Richard F. Long Lillie M. LongCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Minnesota Supply Co. v. Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Klopfer v. Queens Gap Mountain, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Genops Group LLC v. Public House Investments LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Primov v. Serco, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2018
- Paul A. Perez v. Monkeypod Enterprises, LLC and Bryan C. DuenasSupreme Court of Guam · 2022
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.