Legal Opinion

Capps v. Weflen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 2014No. 20140110PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Patricia Capps and others (“Capps”) appeal, and Colleen Weflen and others (‘Weflens”) cross-appeal, from a judgment quieting title to certain Mount-rail County mineral interests in the Capps and the heirs of Ruth Nelson’s estate (“Hassans”). Because the district court erred as a matter of law in ruling the Weflens did not comply with the notice requirements in the abandoned mineral statutes, N.D.C.C. ch. 38-18.1, and because those requirements are constitutional, we reverse and remand for entry of judgment quieting title to the subject mineral interests in the Weflens.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Teigen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nelson v. McAlester Fuel CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Carlson v. GMR Transportation, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Deckert v. McCormickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Nordquist v. AlongeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Estate of Glasoe v. Williams CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API