Capps v. Weflen
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Patricia Capps and others (“Capps”) appeal, and Colleen Weflen and others (‘Weflens”) cross-appeal, from a judgment quieting title to certain Mount-rail County mineral interests in the Capps and the heirs of Ruth Nelson’s estate (“Hassans”). Because the district court erred as a matter of law in ruling the Weflens did not comply with the notice requirements in the abandoned mineral statutes, N.D.C.C. ch. 38-18.1, and because those requirements are constitutional, we reverse and remand for entry of judgment quieting title to the subject mineral interests in the Weflens.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Teigen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nelson v. McAlester Fuel CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Carlson v. GMR Transportation, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Deckert v. McCormickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Nordquist v. AlongeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Estate of Glasoe v. Williams CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.