Legal Opinion

Carlson v. GMR Transportation, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2015No. 20140319PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Merwin and Denise Carlson appealed from a summary judgment dismissing their personal injury and loss of consortium action against GMR Transportation, Inc. Because we conclude the district court did not err in ruling as a matter of law that GMR had not lost its employer immunity under the workers’ compensation laws, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On July 8, 2005, Merwin Carlson was injured in a traffic accident while hauling freight as a trucker under a contract with GMR. On July 5, 2006, Carlson filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits with Workforce Safety and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Carlson v. Roetzel & AndressCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Schramm v. FosterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  3. Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Groleau v. Bjornson Oil Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Mitchell v. SanbornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brock v. PriceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Mullin v. PendlayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Plains Trucking, LLC v. CresapNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Vail v. S/L Services, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API