Legal Opinion

Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. City of Spencer

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided July 31, 1922No. 93PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, District Judge.

The proceeding is one by the city of Spencer, Clay county, Iowa, to assess portions of the cost of a 'storm and sanitary sewer against certain abutting and adjacent property of the *825Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company. Upon the completion of the sewer, and pursuant to the Iowa statute, the city at the proper stage of the proceeding gave notice of the proposed assessment, and the railway company appeared by counsel at the proper time and filed objections to the assessment, which were overruled. The city authorities thereupon levied the assessment, and the railway…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Upshur County v. RichSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Commissioners of Road Improvement District No. 2 v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Searl v. School District No. 2Supreme Court of the United States · 1888

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Minnesota v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1931
  3. Pierce v. DesmondDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1926
  4. O'Neill Bros. v. CrowleyDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1938
  5. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API