Legal Opinion

O'Neill Bros. v. Crowley

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided October 8, 1938No. 2775PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYCHE, District Judge.

’’’bp plaintiff, a corporation under the ’•e of Pennsylvania, instiin the court of common .nburg County against the of whom are citizens and uth Carolina, and engaged artners under the firm name ste Company. By its com-seeks to recover of the de.um of Two Thousand, Five enty and 67/100 ($2,520.67) due time the defendants anomplaint, and among other alltained in the answer, is a sec-ted as a counterclaim, whereby mts seek by way of counter-cover of the plaintiff the sum of usand, Seven Hundred, Fifty 75/100 ($4,758.75) Dollars. Up.ing of this answer, and within .n which…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Merchants Heat & Light Co. v. J. B. Clow & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Mason City & Fort Dodge Railroad v. BoyntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. West v. Aurora CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. City of Aurora v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Chambers v. Skelly Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scott v. Communications Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1991
  2. Haney v. WilcheckDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1941
  3. Sheets v. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  4. C. I. T. Corp. v. AmbroseDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1940
  5. C & G Construction Co. v. WrightSuperior Court of Delaware · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API