Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Desmond

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 1, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLYNEAUX, District Judge.

This is a motion to remand, the action being removed from the Ramsey eounty district court of Minnesota, on the petition of the plaintiff. He sued the defendant, to recover the balance of $353.14, owing him, on two judgments, recovered in actions brought in Wisconsin. The defendant admitted liability on the plaintiff’s claims, and pleaded counterclaims for damages, aggregating $10,500, exclusive of cost and interest.

The plaintiff is a citizen and resident of New York, and the defendant of Minnesota, and they were so at the time of the commencement of this action. It…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boatmen's Bank v. FritzlenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. West v. Aurora CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. Price & Hart v. T. J. Ellis & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1904
  4. Hagerla v. Mississippi River Power Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1912
  5. Carson & Rand Lumber Co. v. HoltzclawU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haney v. WilcheckDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1941
  2. Sheets v. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  3. San Antonio Suburban Irrigated Farms v. ShandyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1928
  4. Zumbrunn v. SchwartzDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1927
  5. City Nat. Bank v. Wichita Royalty Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API