Legal Opinion

Kansas Fire and Safety Equipment v. City of Topeka

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 24, 2022No. 123063Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 123,063 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS KANSAS FIRE AND SAFETY EQUIPMENT, a Kansas corporation, HAL G. RICHARDSON d/b/a BUENO FOOD BRAND, TOPEKA VINYL TOP, and MINUTEMAN SOLAR FILM, Appellants/Cross-appellees, v. CITY OF TOPEKA, KANSAS, Appellee/Cross-appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 26-518 is part of the Eminent Domain Procedure Act (EDPA). The EDPA does not provide third-party displaced persons a private right of action for relocation benefits under K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 26-518. Third-party displaced persons can pursue relocation benefits under the Kansas…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nauheim v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. Hamlin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Pullen v. WestSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. Miller v. BartleSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Johnson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API