Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1996No. 71,419PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.;

This water law case is on appeal from summary judgment. Plaintiffs Oneita and Clara Johnson sued defendants Board of County Commissioners of Pratt County (the County) and Mid-Continent Engineers (MCE) for negligent design and construction of a new bridge over the Ninnescah River, upstream from their properties. The Johnsons seek recovery for erosion damage resulting from flooding of the Ninnescah in 1988 and 1991, which they assert was caused by the new bridge. The County filed a third-party claim for indemnification against the Kansas…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Roe v. DiefendorfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Terry Neustrom v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. Orr v. HeimanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Moore v. Associated Material & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. Unwitting Victim v. C.S.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API