Legal Opinion
Thayer & Chandler v. Wold
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
Decided January 19, 1906No. 27,398PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Equity. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
KOHLSAAT, Circuit Judge.
Defendant is charged in this suit with infringement of claims 1, 2, 8, and 9 of patent No. 474,158, granted to C. E. Burdick, May 3, 1892, for an air brush, and claims 6 and 8 of patent No. 555,669 issued to defendant herein March 3, 1896, likewise for an air brush. The claims read as follows:
Patent No. 474,158.
“1. The combination, in air brushes, of an open receptacle for ink or paint conical at one end and perforated for the delivery of said ink or paint, a valve to close the said perforation and adapted to be operated by hand, a cap covering the conical end of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bundy Mfg. Co. v. Detroit Time-Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Adam v. FolgerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Red Jacket Manuf'g Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
3Cited by3 opinions
- O'DONNELL v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1933
- In re BraseltonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921
- Dalton Adding Mach. Co. v. Rockford Milling Mach. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918