Legal Opinion

Dalton Adding Mach. Co. v. Rockford Milling Mach. Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 8, 1918No. 84PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Dalton Adding Machine Company and the Addograpb Manufacturing Company against the Rockford Milling Machine Company and others. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, District Judge.

‘Phis is an infringement suit on patent No. 1,039,130, issued to the Addograpb Company September 24, 1912, on application filed January 24, 1903,, by Hubert Hopkins, for a patent on an adding and writing machine,. The defenses are tioninfringeinent and'invalidity in part. A general idea of the invention may be had by consulting Dalton Adding Machine Co. v. Moon-Hopkins Billing M. Co. (D. C.) 223 Fed. 51; Moon-Hopkins Billing *188Mach. Co. v. Dalton Adding Mach. Co., 236 Fed. 936, 150 C. C. A. 198. The patent contains 284*claims, of which 44 are in suit, relating only to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Kokomo Fence MacHine Co. v. KitselmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Gould v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Remington Cash Register Co. v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1925
  2. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  3. Plant Products Co. v. Charles Phillips Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API