Legal Opinion

Bundy Mfg. Co. v. Detroit Time-Register Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1899No. 604PublishedCited by 74 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.

1Opinion of the Court

BURTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a bill to restrain infringement of the third and fourth claims of patent No. 452,894, of May 2(i, 1891,' to W. L. Bundy, for a workman’s time recorder; and'also the fourth claim of patent No. 305,882, of September 30, 1884, to W. Bauer, for a watchman’s time detector. The defendant is a corporation known as the Detroit Time-Register Company, and is engaged in making and selling a workman’s time recorder, under a patent to N. M. Watson, No. 515,805, of March 6, 1894. Bundy’s invention relates to time-recording mechanism actuated directly by a clock, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. D'Arcy Spring Co. v. Marshall Ventilated Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  3. Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Superior Drill Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  4. Adam v. FolgerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  5. Standard Caster & Wheel Co. v. Caster Socket Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API