Minnesota Ass'n of Professional Employees v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of its declaratory-judgment action for the complaint’s failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Appellant argues that the district court erred when it concluded that Minnesota law imposes no duty on respondents to ensure equitable compensation for executive-branch employees. Because we agree with the district court’s interpretation of the law, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Minnesota Association of Professional Employees (MAPE) is an employee organization and is the exclusive representative of executive-branch…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Barton v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Gomon v. Northland Family Physicians, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Molloy v. MeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Helmberger v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- MN. ASSN. OF PROF. EMPLOYEES v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007