Phillips v. Smith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
The action was for posses-. sion of real estate and for recovery of rental due under a written lease contract covering the same five-acre tract of land. At the conclusion of all the evidence each party moved for a directed verdict. The trial judge held that this took the issues from the jury, and thereupon directed a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.
The fact that each party moves the court for a peremptory instruction does not constitute a waiver of trial by jury upon the part of either. Taylor v. Wooden et al., 30 Okla. 6, 118 P. 872; J. R. Watkins Co. v. Miller et al., 170…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harrington v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- State ex rel. Dawson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 4Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Canterberry v. CanterberryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
- Benzel v. KilfoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952