Legal Opinion

Benzel v. Kilfoy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 27, 1952No. 34132PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

In the trial of this action the plaintiff, L. W. Kilfoy, sought to recover a broker’s commission for the sale of real estate. There was no issue of fact or controversy as to the fact that defendant, Benzel, owned the real estate; that he listed it with plaintiff for sale, and that a sale was made to one Hoffman for $27,000. The plaintiff was entitled to a commission of 5 per cent, or $1,350, the sum sued for, if he was the procuring cause of the sale to Hoffman.

There was an issue of fact and a controversy as to whether the plaintiff, Kilfoy, was the procuring cause of the sale, or, to be more…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Benzel v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Atlas Life Ins. Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. United States Casualty Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 4Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. J. R. Watkins Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benzel v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API