Legal Opinion
Hunnicutt v. Hawk
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 16, 2000No. 99-6435PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner-appellant Denny Hunnicutt, a federal inmate appearing pro se, appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He filed suit against the warden, challenging the Bureau of Prison’s (BOP) determination that he is ineligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e)(2)(B). Because Mr. Hunnicutt is a federal prisoner, a certificate of appealability is not required to appeal the district court’s denial. See Montez v. McKinna, 208 F.3d 862, 867 (10th Cir.2000); McIntosh v. United States Parole Comm’n, 115 F.3d 809, 810 n. 1 (10th…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Montez v. McKinnaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Marcus Allan McIntosh v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Fristoe v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Pelissero v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- New Mexico Cattle Growers Ass'n v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Standifer v. LedezmaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Izzo v. WileyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Bledsoe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Falan v. GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.