Falan v. Gallegos
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
ROBERT H. HENRY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the petitioner’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). The case is, therefore, ordered submitted without oral argument.
Kenneth Falan, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition challenging the duration of his current federal imprisonment. He claims that he should be given 193 days’ credit toward his federal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Raymond J. Van Skiver Alma L. Van Skiver v. United States of America and John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- James M. Debardeleben v. J.M. Quinlan, R.L. Matthews, N.W. Smith, R.G. Simpson, E. Cave, and W.A. BlountCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Fratus v. DeLandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ahmed v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025
- McKenzie v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2021