Legal Opinion
Cmi Corporation v. Barber-Greene Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 19, 1982No. 81-2733PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from a dispute over the validity of three CMI patents. The patents describe machines used to repair paved roadway surfaces. All three patents were invalidated in the course of the litigation in the district court. Additionally, the district court found CMI guilty of fraud in the prosecution of one of the patents and awarded Barber-Greene attorney fees incurred in defending the infringement claims relating to that patent. We affirm.
The three patents involved are: patent 4,139,318 (Jakob patent); patent Des. 225,-986 (Steele patent); and patent 4,140,420…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Monsanto Company v. Rohm & Haas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- The International Glass Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION INVOLVING FROST PATENT (Ten Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Sarkes Tarzian, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Philco Corporation and Radio Equipment Company, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morgan Adhesives Co. v. Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
- FMC Corp. v. Hennessy Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995