FMC Corp. v. Hennessy Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, District Judge.
This litigation is but one facet of ongoing commercial warfare with a tenacity and duration rivaling the Peloponnesian War. And this memorandum and order relates only to the first facet of a trifurcated litigation. The parties, after over 3500 pages of trial testimony and numerous depositions and exhibits, filed post-trial briefs in excess of 450 pages, and this court, after long delay, is finally prepared to rule. Unlike many patent cases this litigation has been fact-intensive, turning on “who, what, where, when” primary facts. Like many patent…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fmc Corporation and Vulcan Equipment Company, Ltd. v. Hennessy Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Herbko International, Inc. v. Gemmy Industries Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Unique Concepts, Inc. v. ManuelDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. Espeed, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005