Bruck v. Adams
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
This is an appeal from an order granting the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial following judgment on a jury verdict in favor of the defendants in an action for medical malpractice.
Appellant Pliney Adams is a physician, specializing in anesthesiology. In treating respondent, he injected a local anesthetic by needle into respondent’s back, lateral to the midline and adjacent to the lumbar 1-2 interspace. Paralysis resulted. There was conflicting expert testimony on the issues of negligence and proximate cause.
At the conclusion of the trial, the court told the jury that respondent had the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Parker v. WomackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Conner v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dabis v. San Francisco Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975