Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 27, 1969No. 6911SC277PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendants’ assignments of error relate solely to the question of whether the trial judge violated his duty under G.S. 1-180 and expressed an opinion on the evidence through certain comments and questioning of witnesses during the trial.

On cross-examination of the prosecuting witness, Mrs. Pollard, the attorney for the defendant Earl Cox requested the witness to stand and face the wall. Pie then proceeded to cross-examine her at length about the color of shirts being worn by the solicitor and defense attorneys. After she had given her opinion about this the following transpired:

“Q. Mrs.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. State v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Worrell v. Hennis Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. LednumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. LemmondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API