State v. Cox
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The defendants’ assignments of error relate solely to the question of whether the trial judge violated his duty under G.S. 1-180 and expressed an opinion on the evidence through certain comments and questioning of witnesses during the trial.
On cross-examination of the prosecuting witness, Mrs. Pollard, the attorney for the defendant Earl Cox requested the witness to stand and face the wall. Pie then proceeded to cross-examine her at length about the color of shirts being worn by the solicitor and defense attorneys. After she had given her opinion about this the following transpired:
“Q. Mrs.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Worrell v. Hennis Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. LednumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. LemmondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.