Legal Opinion

State v. Buckner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 16, 1977No. 7727SC414PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The defendant, by his first assignment of error, contends that the trial judge expressed an opinion in favor of the State in violation of G.S. 1-180. During the testimony of State’s witness Helton, after he had thoroughly explained the procedures followed when he administered the breathalyzer test, the following exchange took place:

“QUESTION: Now, after having done what you have testified to that you did, what was the result of the test?

Mr. Bumgardner: Objection.

The COURT: Sustained. Go ahead with the foundation as to what rights were explained. He stated he gave him his rights,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Belk v. SchweizerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. ShaddingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Morris v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Rock v. HiattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API