Legal Opinion

Oxley v. Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 24, 1968No. 9897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

The appellant as purchaser commenced this action to have specifically enforced an agreement covering the sale of land and shares in an irrigation company. The trial court denied relief and this appeal was taken. The defendants in the trial court were the sellers named in the sales agreement and the City of Trinidad. The City was the purchaser of the water rights under an agreement prior in time to the one between plaintiff-appellant and the land owners. Jurisdiction is based on diversity.

On this appeal the principal issue concerns the relationship between the agreement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. System Investment Corp. v. Montview Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Amster v. TenneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  3. Millard v. MartinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oxley v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API