Ankeny, Admr. v. Lohr
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, P. J.,
The first question presented is whether judgments entered by confession after the death of a plaintiff by his administrator without formal substitution appearing on the record are valid? There were three judgments in the amounts of $1,100, $980 and $700, respectively, all entered February 13, 1926, against Breekenridge Lohr, the appellant, and in favor of E. M. Ankeny, administrator of C. Gr. Stranb. A petition to open the judgment was presented and contained, inter alia, an allegation that the judgments were void because entered after the death of the plaintiff, C.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McKee v. VernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Wilson v. VanLeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Mahoney v. CollmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Whitmire v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Williams v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Knuth v. Erie-Crawford Dairy Cooperative AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Knuth v. Erie-Crawford Dairy Cooperative Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Burig v. Washington County Commissioners, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1943
- Longacre v. Breisch, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1934
- Ressler v. Brown, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montour County1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.