Legal Opinion

Ankeny, Admr. v. Lohr

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1930No. Appeal 17, 18 and 19PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

The first question presented is whether judgments entered by confession after the death of a plaintiff by his administrator without formal substitution appearing on the record are valid? There were three judgments in the amounts of $1,100, $980 and $700, respectively, all entered February 13, 1926, against Breekenridge Lohr, the appellant, and in favor of E. M. Ankeny, administrator of C. Gr. Stranb. A petition to open the judgment was presented and contained, inter alia, an allegation that the judgments were void because entered after the death of the plaintiff, C.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McKee v. VernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Wilson v. VanLeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Mahoney v. CollmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Whitmire v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Williams v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Knuth v. Erie-Crawford Dairy Cooperative AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  2. Knuth v. Erie-Crawford Dairy Cooperative Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Burig v. Washington County Commissioners, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1943
  4. Longacre v. Breisch, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1934
  5. Ressler v. Brown, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montour County1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API