Legal Opinion
James D. Adams v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 4, 1987No. Appeal 86-1140PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, who are all employees of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) of the Treasury Department (Treasury), appeal a decision of the United States Claims Court (Mayer, J.) refusing, on cross-motions for summary judgment, to require the employing agency to disregard the limitation of a 4% pay increase (for fiscal year 1983) imposed by Treasury on its employees. Adams v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 546 (1986). We affirm.
I
As the Claims Court determined—and the parties do not controvert—the material facts are not disputed. Appellants are electrolytic platemakers and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Amell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Congress Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- National Maritime Union of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stephen Bosco, Charles L. Davis, Ray Dean Williams, John M. Wolf, and All Similarly Situated Individuals v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Daniel Bradley v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Best v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Averi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Bevevino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.