Legal Opinion

Robb v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1933No. 24848. En BancPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steinert, J.—

This action was brought by a taxpayer of the city of Tacoma to test the validity of a' proposed sewer bond issue. A demurrer to the complaint having been overruled, the defendants filed an answer admitting all the allegations of the complaint, save one, which presented only a question of law; the answer also contained an affirmative defense, to which a demurrer was interposed and sustained. Upon refusal of the defendants to plead further, judgment was entered enjoining the city and its officials from proceeding with the issuance and sale of the bonds. The defendants have appealed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Edwards v. MillarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Alexander v. People ex rel. SchoolfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. State v. TausickWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State ex rel. Chamberlin v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gangemi v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. In Re ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. King County Water District No. 54 v. King County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Union High School District No. 1 v. Taxpayers of Union High School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Bronson v. MoonenOregon Supreme Court · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API