Legal Opinion

Mica Industries, Inc. v. Penland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1959No. 19PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bobbitt, J. '

The -only question presented is whether -the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to amended complaint. (The judgment did not dissolve the restraining order, nor did it dismiss -the action.)

Plaintiff does not attack the judgment or the execution. But the judgment is against Minerals Processing Company, not against plaintiff; and the execution authorizes the sheriff to levy on and to sell property of Mineral© Processing Company, -not property of plaintiff.

Only property of the judgment debtor may be levied on and sold under execution. G.S. 1-315. A levy made on property of a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bowen v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Stamey v. Rutherfordton Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Martin v. Buffaloe.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Bowen v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gallimore v. SinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Garvin v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Garvin v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Community Credit Co. of Lenoir, Inc. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Ballance v. DunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API