Mica Industries, Inc. v. Penland
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bobbitt, J. '
The -only question presented is whether -the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to amended complaint. (The judgment did not dissolve the restraining order, nor did it dismiss -the action.)
Plaintiff does not attack the judgment or the execution. But the judgment is against Minerals Processing Company, not against plaintiff; and the execution authorizes the sheriff to levy on and to sell property of Mineral© Processing Company, -not property of plaintiff.
Only property of the judgment debtor may be levied on and sold under execution. G.S. 1-315. A levy made on property of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bowen v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Stamey v. Rutherfordton Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Martin v. Buffaloe.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Bowen v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gallimore v. SinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Garvin v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Garvin v. City of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Community Credit Co. of Lenoir, Inc. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Ballance v. DunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.