Legal Opinion

Ballance v. Dunn

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1989No. 881DC1418PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

I

This case involved two legal actions alleging trespass to land claimed by the plaintiffs. In the second action (No. 86CVD44), the defendants, citing the judgment in the first action (No. 84CVD41), pled res judicata as an affirmative defense and moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. To understand the court’s ruling it is necessary to review the procedural history of both actions in some detail.

The parcel of land at issue, approximately 255 feet in length and 25 feet…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Rodgers Builders, Inc. v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Crosland-Cullen Company v. CroslandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Northwestern Financial Group, Inc. v. County of GastonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Moody v. Able Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Davis v. Durham Mental Health Developmental Disabilities Substance Abuse Area AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  4. Holly Farm Foods, Inc. v. KuykendallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Hughes v. InsleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API