Yeates v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
On Motion to Remand to State Court.
1Opinion of the Court
KOHIySAAT, District Judge.
The plaintiff heretofore moved the court to remand said cause to the state court. On November 28, 1904, that motion was denied. Afterward, and on March 20, 1905, plaintiff renewed his application to remand, and leave was given to file briefs. The first count of the declaration, which substantially presents the facts of the case, s,ets out in substance that the Illinois Central Railroad Company owned and operated certain tracks in this jurisdiction, certain of which, by agreement, were used jointly by it and the Michigan Central Railroad Company; that by virtue of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. SolanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Curtis v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Illinois · 1905
- United States ex rel. Attorney General v. Union Stockyard & Transit Co. of ChicagoCommerce Court · 1911
- Goede v. City of Colorado SpringsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.