United States ex rel. Attorney General v. Union Stockyard & Transit Co. of Chicago
Commerce Court
Petition for mandamus, on relation of the Attorney General, against the Union Stockyard & Transit Company of Chicago and others.
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Judge.
This proceeding is brought to compel the Union Stockyard & Transit Company of Chicago (hereinafter called the “Stockyard Co.”) and the Chicago Junction Railway Company (hereinafter called the “Junction Co.”) to file with the Interstate Commerce Commission tariffs in conformity with section 6, and reports and statements in conformity with section 20, of the act to regulate commerce (Act Eeb. 4, 1887, as amended June 29, 1906 [34 Stat. 586, 593]), and of the rules and regulations adopted by the Commission pursuant théreto, and to enjoin the Sto'ckyard Co. and the individual…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati. N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. Colorado & N. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- American Express Co. v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1913