Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Illinois

Decided October 20, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On Motion to Remand to State Court.

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, District Judge.

This is an action on the case by the plaintiff against the defendants for personal injuries, while employed as a-*778brakeman, in consequence of the alleged negligence of the defendants. The action was commenced in the state court. The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, being a corporation organized in a different state from the one in which the suit was begun, applied to the state court for a removal of the cause to this court on the ground of a separable cause of action from its codefendant, a local corporation. The state court ordered the removal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. HartIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Yeates v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Travis v. Kansas City, S. & G. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. North Side Canal Co. v. Twin Falls Canal Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1926
  5. United States ex rel. Attorney General v. Union Stockyard & Transit Co. of ChicagoCommerce Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API