Legal Opinion
Brocia v. Franklin Plan Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 11, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.
Plaintiff seeks in this action to recover a personal judgment against the defendant for damages arising out of an alleged breach of contract.
The defendant is a Delaware corporation, having its principal office in Wilmington, Del., and its executive office in Philadelphia. It has no permit to do business in this State.
Claiming that it is not engaged in business within this State, so as to make it amenable to the service of judicial process herein, defendant moves to set aside the service of the summons which has been made upon Franklin W. Ryan, one of its vice-presidents, while he was in New…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Holzer v. . Dodge BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Pomeroy v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Brandow v. Murray & Tregurtha Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Soltex Polymer Corp. v. Fortex Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Bryant v. Finnish National AirlineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Deere & Company v. Superior Court for Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Kasprzak v. Mutual Life Assur. Co. of CanadaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
- Schwartz v. Breakers Hotel Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.