Legal Opinion

Brandow v. Murray & Tregurtha Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

The action is to recover the sum of $1,896.27 for advertisements published in a trade paper known as Motor Boat, published by the Motor Boat Publishing Company, a New Jersey corporation, from the defendant, a Massachusetts corporation. The plaintiff is assignee of the claim. The defendant manufactures marine engines in Massachusetts and sells them to dealers. Bruns, Kimball & Co. are marine engine dealers, doing business in the city of New York, buying engines from the defendant at a fixed discount and reselling them to their own customers. They are in no sense the selling agents of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Holzer v. . Dodge BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Meyer v. Sachs Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Amphicar Corp. of America v. Gregstad Distrib. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Brocia v. Franklin Plan Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Galbraith v. YancikNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Tel-A-Sign, Inc. v. WeesnerNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Scheinman v. Bonwit, Teller & Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API