Legal Opinion
Kasprzak v. Mutual Life Assur. Co. of Canada
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided November 29, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
This is a motion to vacate the service of the summons on the ground that defendant is a foreign corporation not doing business in the state of New York, and that the court is therefore without jurisdiction. Plaintiff is a resident of the state of New York. Defendant is a corporation organized under and by virtue of the laws of the province of Ontario, Dominion of Canada, and has its head office at Waterloo, Ontario.
Summons was served on July 22, 1932, on the state superintendent of insurance of the state of New York, and venue was laid in the Supreme Court, Niagara…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atlas Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. PortschellerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945
- Arkwright Mutual Insurance Co. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- AMT Capital Holdings, S.A. v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of Can.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018