State v. Simpson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
From his two felony convictions of obtaining property by false pretenses, defendant, David Vernon Simpson, argues on appeal that the trial court erroneously (1) granted the State’s joinder motion, (2) granted the State’s motion to amend the indictment, and (3) denied his motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence. We find no error.
The underlying evidence tends to show that on 26 November 2001, Robert Hoyt, a manager for the photo lab at a Wal-Mart Store, noticed three cameras missing from the Wal-Mart display. Later that day, Tim Ward, the owner and operator of Hendersonville…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. BrayboyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HallumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003