Legal Opinion
Spence v. Maryland Casualty Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 26, 1992No. 1:89-cr-00158PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SKRETNY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Erwin J. Spence, Jr. (“plaintiff”), moves for partial summary judgment and for an order striking defendants’ respective Answers for abuse of discovery. Defendants cross-move for summary judgment against all of plaintiff’s causes of action. The parties’ respective summary judgment motions are brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Plaintiff’s motion to strike defendants’ Answers is brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(C).
Within the context of these summary judgment motions, defendants move for sanctions against plaintiff,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cusamano v. SobekDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Daka, Inc. v. BreinerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Settle v. Baltimore CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Spence v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Swenson v. Northern Crop Insurance, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.