Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Corcoran

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1937No. 7,634PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to two lots in the city of Great Falls. His complaint was in the usual short form in actions of this character. Defendant’s answer was in the form of a creditor’s bill. The reply raised certain issues with the allegations in the answer. Since no question is here raised as to the sufficiency of the pleadings it is unnecessary to note the allegations in detail.

The cause was tried before the court sitting without a jury. Extensive and numerous findings of fact were made. The conclusions of law determine the case in favor of the defendant; judgment was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Aransas Pass Harbor Co. v. ManningTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. McConnell v. Combination Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Renland v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Roman v. AlbertMontana Supreme Court · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lewis v. BowmanMontana Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Knox Glass Bottle Co. v. UnderwoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Holenstein v. AndrewsMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Bingham v. National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Detra v. BartolettiMontana Supreme Court · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API