Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Dunbar v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1931No. Nos. 23089, 23110, 23111. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.
Cause No. 23089 is a petition for a writ of review; in cause No. 23110, the relator likewise seeks a writ of review; and in cause No. 23111, a writ of prohibition is sought. All of these actions grow out of one proceeding now pending in the superior court, and, counsel consenting, this court has ordered that they be consolidated, to the end that the three questions raised be all disposed of at one time and in one opinion.
It appears that on. February 28, 1931, the Attorney General, proceeding under § 13, chapter 169, Laws of 1919, p. 505, as modified by a later act, filed his complaint in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Union Savings & Investment Co. v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Read v. RyanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Casedy v. Inter-State Fisheries Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
- Willett v. JaneckeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Empire Trust Co. v. AubreyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Cashmere State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Hansen v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- State ex rel. Sim v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Monroe v. WinnWashington Supreme Court · 1943