Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Johnson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1988No. 86-652PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a review by writ of certiorari. We granted the writ in response to Donald R. Johnson's petition, which asserts that the Court of Criminal Appeals erred to reversal, 502 So.2d 401 (Ala.Crim.App. 1986), in affirming his conviction on two counts of motor vehicle theft. As grounds in support thereof, he argues that the trial court improperly admitted into evidence a statement that, he says, was obtained by police in violation of constitutional safeguards, and that the trial court improperly allowed a jointly indicated co-defendant to testify for the State over the objection of petitioner.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. Callahan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Ex Parte GaddySupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. O.M. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API