Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Matthews

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 7, 1992No. 1901837PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Corey Matthews pleaded guilty to robbery, burglary, and theft of property. Before pleading guilty, Matthews moved to suppress certain incriminating statements that he made to police officers and an investigator for the district attorney's office. At the suppression hearing, the record shows that the following statements were made to Matthews before he made his incriminating statements:

1) "There's a possibility that being an accomplice and not actually doing the deed, you might get boot camp."

2) "Let me explain something to you, I'm not the investigator for this department, I'm the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. Miguel Angel RecaldeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Eakes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  2. State v. SwaniganSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. McLeod v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. State v. TuttleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ex Parte GaddySupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API