Legal Opinion
Concerned Citizens Coalition v. City of Stockton
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 2005No. C046524PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBIE, J.
Is an order under Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 662 vacating a judgment and reopening the case for further proceedings appealable? We conclude it is not. Accordingly, this appeal (and the related protective cross-appeal) must be dismissed. Further, we decline to exercise our discretion to treat this appeal from a nonappealable order as a petition for an extraordinary writ.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In February 2003, the City of Stockton, acting through its city council, approved a contract with OMI/Thames Water Stockton, Inc. (OMI/Thames) to “privatize” the operation…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Zavala v. ArceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Art Movers, Inc. v. Ni West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Gardner v. Rich Manufacturing Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- United Professional Planning, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- In re Insurance Installment Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Dakota Payphone, LLC v. AlcarazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Luckett v. PanosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.