Legal Opinion

Spindor v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1975No. B-4938PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*64GREENHILL, Chief Justice.

Needing a pipeline right-of-way, Lo-Vaca Gathering Company, under its power of eminent domain, took a 13.5 acre strip across the land of Joe Spindor and wife. The Spindors were awarded $2,700 for the strip taken and $7,244.80 for damages to their adjacent land, herein called the remainder. A road used for laying the pipeline was built across a lake of the Spindors, and therein lies the problem. The trial court admitted certain photographic and testimonial evidence discussed below relating to damages to a portion of the remainder, the lake. The Court of Civil Appeals…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Austin v. CannizzoTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. City of Pearland v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. City of Lagrange v. PierattTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Texas Electric Service Company v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Porras v. CraigTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of Houston v. Precast Structures, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  3. State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. State v. Munday EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. State v. McCarley, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API