Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Holman v. Longfellow Restaurant

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1996No. 95-405PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The commission’s determination of permanent partial disability purports to include consideration of claimant’s nonmedical disability factors. The commission, however, does not seriously dispute the assertion that its award was premised solely upon medical or clinical findings that were reasonably demonstrable. One question is therefore before us: Did the commission abuse its discretion in basing its award solely upon those factors? We find no abuse of discretion for two reasons.

*46I

R.C. 4123.57 read in part:

“The district hearing officer, upon such application, shall determine the percentage of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Kaska v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Matheney v. Central Ohio Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Hall v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. King v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Matheney v. Cent. Ohio Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Neumeyer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API