Blindman v. Industrial Loan & Thrift Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 266 N.W. 455, 267 N.W. 143. Defendant appeals from the judgment.
The action was brought by the plaintiffs, the makers of the promissory note hereinafter described, to set aside and cancel the note on the ground of usury and to recover certain collateral securities transferred to the defendant as security for the payment of the note. The defendant denied that there was any usury and counterclaimed for the balance due on the note, the note having been reduced by certain collections made on the collateral securities held by defendant. The note is dated December 18, 1931, and matured…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Eldred v. HartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Stein v. SwensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Koehler v. DodgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Flint v. SheldonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- Vela v. ShacklettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- ICC Leasing Corp. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Citizen's National Bank of Willmar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Midland Loan Finance Co. v. LorentzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Linne v. RonkainenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.